Whatever it's called, spreading the Gospel sounds like a big responsibility: and a lot of work. I'm a Catholic layman, with no formal theological training. Can't I let someone else evangelize, 'spread the Gospel,' and just go to church once a week?
I've got free will, so I could decide to stop being a practicing Catholic: which would be a daft decision. Since I intend to stay with my Lord's church, I need to spread the Gospel. It's part of being Catholic:
"Go, therefore, 12 and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the holy Spirit,The Church has more to say, like Matthew 28:16-20; Mark 16:14; and Catechism of the Catholic Church, 900, 1122.
"teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you. 13 And behold, I am with you always, until the end of the age.' "
(Matthew 28:19-20)
Basically, as a practicing Catholic I have to do my share of 'making disciples of all nations.' Which isn't the same as forcing folks to say they agree with me. And that's yet another topic. Topics.
Maintaining this blog seemed like a good way to do my evangelizing. I'm always ready to improve my skills, so I was glad to read something on the USCCB Blog.
Social Media, Passing Notes, and Spreading the Gospel
Yesterday I noticed and 'reTweeted' a 'Tweet' by @bostoncatholic, the Archdiocese of Boston's Twitter account. In other words, I passed along a note written by someone else: acknowledging the original writer.Since quite a few folks use Twitter, or know about the social media service, or have heard jokes about Twitter and 'Tweeting,' I figure that it's safe to use words like "reTweet." I could be wrong about that: which is why I explained what the words meant.
The Archdiocese of Boston was letting folks know about a post written by the Media Relations staff of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, or USCCB:
"The Gospel and Social Media"
USCCB Blog (July 5, 2012)
"Two caveats for evangelizers, that is, those who spread the Gospel today: 1. Use social media and 2. Follow its rules. It's a new day in church work: the computer has replaced the pen, 15 minutes seems like eternity, and if you don't get your message out fast, the audience disappears...."
Eschew Obfuscation, and Other Good Advice
The USCCB Blog post is a quick read. It's also one of the very few blog posts that I've printed out, re-read, and 'studied.' I've underlined, bracketed, and otherwise marked up the printout: and intend to use it as a sort of 'checklist' when I write.The USCCB Blog post is mostly a 10-point list of good advice for folks using social media:
"...some rules for social media evangelization:"
- Translate church teaching
- Avoid church speak
- Use images, as Jesus did
- Understand that social media is social
- Social media sometimes calls for a suit of armor
- Use the delete button
- Spread Catholicism’s fun parts
- Remember rules are changing
- Remember web messages live forever
- Keep it short
(USCCB Blog)
Screen Names and Personal Safety
Something not in that 10-point list is "be yourself." Literally.There's probably a controversy going on about whether or not it's 'right' to use screen names, pseudonyms for social media. I think it's a good idea, letting readers know who the writer is: usually.
Some folks live in countries where simply sharing an article you found on the Internet is punishable by death:
- "Afghan Reporter Asks Questions, Must Die: Afghanistan Court, House, Senate, Defend Islam Against Discussion"
Another War-on-Terror Blog (January 31, 2008)
Screen Names and Credibility
I live in America, a country with a pretty good track record for tolerating folks who aren't on the same page as the country's leadership. I've used screen names, but don't need to protect myself and my family from thought police. That's why I use my real name in online profiles: Brian Gill; or Brian H. Gill.I don't think cloaking my identity is a good way to gain credibility. Since I share ideas that should be taken seriously, hiding behind a screen name doesn't seem prudent.
There's something to the idea of being 'transparent,' in the sense of being "free of deceit."
- Transparent (adjective)
- Transmitting light
- Able to be seen through with clarity
- So thin as to transmit light
- Free of deceit
- Easily understood or seen through
- Because of a lack of subtlety
- Transmitting light
'On Twitter, I'm Aluwir'
I've used several screen names: like Norski; Conan the Philosopher; and Aluwir. I like "Norski," since I'm half Norwegian: but found that quite a few other folks like it too: and something like "Norski347" wouldn't be all that memorable."Aluwir" is my favorite, since it's easy to 'say,' seems to be memorable: and is, to the best of my knowledge, unique. When someone else gets "Brian Gill" as a screen name, Aluwir is now my second choice:
- "Why Using Your Real Name on Twitter Makes Sense"
Apathetic Lemming of the North (April 21, 2009)
Where was I? Names, screen names, social media. Not being anonymous. Right.
I want folks to find what I write, and take some of it seriously, so I make an effort to be 'findable' online:
- Social media
- Facebook
Brian H. Gill
facebook.com/BrianHGill -
Google+
Brian H. Gill on Google+ - Twitter
Aluwir
twitter.com/Aluwir
- Facebook
- A Small World of Websites
(brianhgill.com)
Includes links to
- "The Gospel and Social Media"
USCCB Blog (July 5, 2012)
What About the Lemming?
One of my blogs, Narcissus-X, is "a blog entirely devoted to Narcissus-X." I'm pretty sure that nobody thinks the blog's fictional author, an angsty and dubiously-sane artist, is a real person. I enjoy writing posts for Narcissus-X, since it allows me to have fun with language - and indirectly opine about the sort of self-centeredness that's been fashionable lately. I think it's funny, but your experience may vary.Another blog, Apathetic Lemming of the North, is presumably written by an unusually large lemming who wears flannel shirts. The blog's "About the Lemming" page explains who I am, and why I chose that name for the blog.
From "Friday the Lemming Slept Late," Apathetic Lemming of the North. June 29, 2012.
I'm fairly confident that folks who read Apathetic Lemming of the North realize that a human being is really writing the posts: not a big flannel-wearing Lemming. And that's yet again more topics.
Related posts:
- Blogging
- "The Important Idea, Charisms, and Working With What I've Got"
(June 24, 2012) - "Babies, Family, the Universe, and Beyond"
(June 10, 2012) - "Automated Translation: Why Not?"
(May 5, 2012) - "Blogging, the Vatican, and Getting a Grip"
(April 9, 2011) - "A Catholic Blogger In the Digital Continent"
(November 15, 2010)
- "The Important Idea, Charisms, and Working With What I've Got"
- Communicating
- "Spamming for Jesus?"
(June 6, 2012) - "Catholics, Credulity, and Credibility"
(February 12, 2012) - " 'EF,' 'OF,' Jargon, and Making Sense"
(April 21, 2011) - " 'What We Got Here is Failure to Communicate?' "
(March 8, 2011) - "Compromise, No: Communicate, Yes"
(June 16, 2010)
- "Spamming for Jesus?"
- Living in a big world
- "Playing 'Victim;' Living in a Big World"
Another War-on-Terror Blog (March 13, 2012) - "Father Beheads Daughter, Singer Killed: Opine, But Check Your Facts!"
(June 19, 2012) - "Fulton Sheen, Bias, and the Catholic Church"
(March 28, 2012) - "Religious Freedom, Niemöller, and Muslims in America"
(April 7, 2011) - "Getting Called an Islamophobe, Saving Lives"
Another War-on-Terror Blog (November 10, 2009)
- "Playing 'Victim;' Living in a Big World"
No comments:
Post a Comment