Monday, October 24, 2011

Mephistopheles and an - Ersatz Hot Babe?!


New post about Marlowe's
"The Tragical History of Doctor Faustus" each Monday

Okay: Doctor Faustus has signed away his soul. Then he explained, to Mephistopheles, that the contract is null and void because Hell doesn't really exist. You can't argue with logic like that.

Now I come to part of Marlowe's "The Tragical History of Dr. Faustus" where we see that Faustus hasn't completely lost touch with reality.

Faustus, Mephistopheles, and Big Plans

Earlier in the play, Faustus seemed to have big plans for using Mephistopheles' abilities. Here's the sort of orders he told Mephistopheles to expect:
"...To do whatever Faustus shall command,
Be it to make the moon drop from her sphere,
Or the ocean to overwhelm the world....
"

"...join the hills that bind the Afric shore,
And make that country63 continent to Spain,
And both contributory to my crown:
The Emperor shall not live but by my leave....
"
("The Tragical History of Doctor Faustus")
Now, with all the power of Hell at his command, Doctor Faustus gives Mephistopheles his first task. John Faustus wants - to get married?!
"...FAUSTUS.... But, leaving off this, let me have a wife,95
The fairest maid in Germany;
For I am wanton and lascivious,
And cannot live without a wife....
"
("The Tragical History of Doctor Faustus")
Some of what Faustus says makes sense: "fairest maid;" feeling "wanton and lascivious." I can see how someone in Faustus' position, feeling like "casual and unrestrained ... sexual behavior" and "driven by lust."1

Not a 'Girlfriend,' Concubine, or Hot Date: Faustus Wants a Wife?!

Setting ethics aside for the moment, I can see why Faustus might want what we euphemistically call a girlfriend.

But a wife?!

Particularly from a Catholic perspective, that doesn't make sense. Not in this context. Marriage is one of the Sacraments of the Catholic Church.2 Definitely not the sort of thing I'd expect someone to go to Hell for. Or, rather, to secure the services of a demon from Hell in order to acquire.

Good grief, neither of those sentences sound right.

I'll get back to marriage, after slogging through more of Marlowe's play:

Mephistopheles' First Task - or - Good Help is So Hard to Find

Looks like Mephistopheles doesn't think much of the doctor's order, either. But a contract's a contract: so the devil produces a really hot wife for Faustus:
"...MEPHIST. How! a wife!
I prithee, Faustus, talk not of a wife.


"FAUSTUS. Nay, sweet Mephistophilis, fetch me one, for
I will have one.


"MEPHIST. Well, thou wilt have one? Sit there till I come: I'll
fetch thee a wife in the devil's name.
[Exit.]


"Re-enter MEPHISTOPHILIS with a DEVIL drest like a WOMAN,
with fire-works.


"MEPHIST. Tell me,96 Faustus, how dost thou like thy wife?..."
("The Tragical History of Doctor Faustus")
Maybe this "DEVIL drest like a WOMAN, with fire-works" was comic relief. Also a redolent visual pun. And a fire hazard, in those mostly-wooden Elizabethan theaters. Which is another topic.

Marlowe's Faustus may have just finished explaining to a demon that Hell doesn't exist: but the doctor isn't completely delusional. At least, that's what I think is behind his reaction to this hot "wife" that Mephistopheles dredged up:
"...FAUSTUS. A plague on her for a hot whore!"

"MEPHIST. Tut, Faustus,
Marriage is but a ceremonial toy....
"
("The Tragical History of Doctor Faustus")
Mephistopheles asks Faustus, rather politely, to stop asking for a wife. Instead, he assures his employer, "I'll cull thee out the fairest courtezans..."

Faustus: Everything He Wanted, and Less

After a bit of flowery language about the courtesans, Mephistopheles distracts Faustus with a book. Several, actually:
"...Hold, take this book, peruse it thoroughly:
[Gives book.]


"The iterating99 of these lines brings gold;
The framing of this circle on the ground
Brings whirlwinds, tempests, thunder, and lightning;
Pronounce this thrice devoutly to thyself,
And men in armour shall appear to thee,
Ready to execute what thou desir'st.


"FAUSTUS. Thanks, Mephistophilis: yet fain would I have a book wherein I might behold all spells and incantations, that I might raise up spirits when I please.

"MEPHIST. Here they are in this book.
[Turns to them.]


"FAUSTUS. Now would I have a book where I might see all characters and planets of the heavens, that I might know their motions and dispositions.

"MEPHIST. Here they are too.
[Turns to them.]

("The Tragical History of Doctor Faustus")
At least Faustus seems to be back on track with the big plans he had when he started out. Not that world conquest is a good idea.

Now that he's got what he thought he wanted, though, Faustus seems to be dissatisfied:
"FAUSTUS. Nay, let me have one book more,—and then I have done, - wherein I might see all plants, herbs, and trees, that grow upon the earth.

"MEPHIST. Here they be.

"FAUSTUS. O, thou art deceived.

"MEPHIST. Tut, I warrant thee.
[Turns to them.]...

Faustus and Repentance

I suppose Faustus could be criticized at this point for being indecisive.

He'd gone to all that trouble:
  • Bargained away his soul
  • Drawn up that contract
  • At least sketched out what he planned to do after he had Africa and Spain "both contributory to my crown"
    • Presumably
Now it looks like Faustus may be having second thoughts. That's the sort of wishy-washy behavior that drives parents batty, when their kids won't finish projects they start.

In this case, however, I think Faustus might be excused for lack of follow-through. Let's see what happens:
"...FAUSTUS. When I behold the heavens, then I repent,
And curse thee, wicked Mephistophilis,
Because thou hast depriv'd me of those joys.


"MEPHIST. Why, Faustus,
Thinkest thou heaven is such a glorious thing?
I tell thee, 'tis not half so fair as thou,
Or any man that breathes on earth.


"FAUSTUS. How prov'st thou that?

"MEPHIST. 'Twas made for man, therefore is man more excellent.

"FAUSTUS. If it were made for man, 'twas made for me:
I will renounce this magic and repent....

("The Tragical History of Doctor Faustus")
Right on cue, here comes that bipolar duo, GOOD ANGEL and EVIL ANGEL:
"...Enter GOOD ANGEL and EVIL ANGEL.

"GOOD ANGEL. Faustus, repent; yet God will pity thee.

"EVIL ANGEL. Thou art a spirit; God cannot pity thee.

"FAUSTUS. Who buzzeth in mine ears I am a spirit?
Be I a devil, yet God may pity me;
Ay, God will pity me, if I repent.


"EVIL ANGEL. Ay, but Faustus never shall repent.
[Exeunt ANGELS.]...
"
("The Tragical History of Doctor Faustus")
"[Exeunt ANGELS.]?!" That's IT?!! No effort to either push Faustus over the edge, or try to pull him back?

On the other hand, GOOD ANGEL had sensible advice, and EVIL ANGEL fed Faustus the sort of theological hooey that seems to resonate in that learned head. More about that, next week.

Marriage is a Big Deal, Mephistopheles Notwithstanding

I've gotten the impression that America's 'serious thinkers' have turned the volume down a bit on the 'marriage is legalized rape' line. For the last four decades or so, though, the establishment3 has seen marriage as:
  • Oppression of women
    • By a society that's
      • Male-dominated
      • Authoritarian
      • Pretty much icky
  • An outmoded custom that
    • Oppresses women
    • Stifles self-expression
      • Only having sex with one's spouse?
  • A strictly secular custom
    • That should be 'improved'
I also remember the 'good old days,' when a remarkable number of folks really believed that
  • Young women should be 'nice'
  • Young men would sow wild oats
    • 'Boys will be boys'
      • And all that
If that doesn't seem to make sense: I agree. I also don't think that lowering expectations for everybody was a sensible solution.

Then there are the men who read Ephesians 5:22, and are convinced that God gives them the right to order their wives around. Incredibly, some women see it the same way.

Never mind what Ephesians 5:21-30 says. Particularly Ephesians 5:25 and following.

There's a pretty good summary of what the Catholic Church says about marriage in Catechism of the Catholic Church, 1659-1666.

Back to Marlowe's Faustus

I'm not sure why Marlowe's Faustus wanted a wife, instead of a more casual domestic arrangement. Maybe that'll come out, later in the play.

Or maybe Faustus is a whole lot more 'conventional' than he seems. Or unimaginative.

More posts in this series:Vaguely-related posts:
Background:
"...Faustus" excerpts in these posts taken from:

1 Definitions:
  • Lascivious (adjective)
    • Driven by lust; preoccupied with or exhibiting lustful desires) "libidinous orgies"
    (Princeton's WordNet)
  • Wanton
    • (Noun)
      • Lewd or lascivious woman
    • (Verb)
      • Waste time; spend one's time idly or inefficiently
      • Indulge in a carefree or voluptuous way of life
      • Spend wastefully
      • Become extravagant; indulge (oneself) luxuriously
      • Engage in amorous play
      • Behave extremely cruelly and brutally
    • (adjective)
      • Occurring without motivation or provocation
      • Casual and unrestrained in sexual behavior
    (Princeton's WordNet)
2 About marriage, Catholic style, in the Catechism of the Catholic Church:
  • The sacrament of marriage
    1601-1658
    • Summarized
      1659-1666
    • Marriage in God's Plan
      1602
      • Marriage in the order of creation
        1603-1605
      • Marriage under the regime of sin
        1606-1608
      • Marriage under the pedagogy of the law
        1609-1611
      • Marriage in the Lord
        1612-16171617
      • Virginity for the sake of the Kingdom
        1618-1620
    • The Celebration of Marriage
      1621-1624
    • Matrimonial Consent
      1625-1632
      • Mixed marriages and disparity of cult
        1633-1637
        • This has nothing to do with ethnicity
        • In this context, a
          • Mixed marriage is a "marriage between a Catholic and a baptized non-Catholic" (1633)
          • Marriage with disparity of cult is "between a Catholic and a non-baptized person" (1633)
          • I was a baptized Christian, but not a Catholic, when my wife and I married, so ours was a mixed marriage
    • The Effects of the Sacrament of Matrimony
      1638
    • The Goods and Requirements of Conjugal Love
      1643
      • The unity and indissolubility of marriage
        1644-1645
      • The fidelity of conjugal love
        1646-1651
      • The openness to fertility
      • The Domestic Church
        1652-1654
    • The Domestic Church
      1655-1658
3 Back when 'down with the establishment' was a popular catchphrase, 'the establishment' in America was mostly white, almost all male, and seriously in need of attitude adjustments. Those were the 'good old days' when "she's as smart as a man" was supposed to be a compliment: and I don't ever want to go back.

That was then. This is now. 'The establishment' is somewhat less-obviously a WASP nest, but some of the 'good old-fashioned values' show considerable durability. More:

2 comments:

Brigid said...

Missing a period: "like "casual and unrestrained ... sexual behavior" and "driven by lust"1"

Usually one word: "euphemistically call a girl friend."

The Friendly Neighborhood Proofreader

P.S. "Thanks, Mephistophilis" Wow. I didn't know they said 'thanks' back then. It sounds so strange reading that amongst all the flowery language.

And I vote for Faustus being unimaginative.

Brian Gill said...

Brigid,

Fixed, and thanks!

And, yeah: Elizabethan language isn't really all that different from contemporary English: even the 'flowery' style. It helps, I think, hearing someone *say* it with a conversational rhythm and tone.

Like it? Pin it, Plus it, - - -

Pinterest: My Stuff, and More

Advertisement

Unique, innovative candles


Visit us online:
Spiral Light CandleFind a Retailer
Spiral Light Candle Store

Popular Posts

Label Cloud

1277 abortion ADD ADHD-Inattentive Adoration Chapel Advent Afghanistan Africa America Amoris Laetitia angels animals annulment Annunciation anti-catholicism Antichrist apocalyptic ideas apparitions archaeology architecture Arianism art Asperger syndrome assumptions asteroid astronomy Australia authority balance and moderation baptism being Catholic beliefs bias Bible Bible and Catechism bioethics biology blogs brain Brazil business Canada capital punishment Caritas in Veritate Catechism Catholic Church Catholic counter-culture Catholicism change happens charisms charity Chile China Christianity Christmas citizenship climate change climatology cloning comets common good common sense Communion community compassion confirmation conscience conversion Corpus Christi cosmology creation credibility crime crucifix Crucifixion Cuba culture dance dark night of the soul death depression designer babies despair detachment devotion discipline disease diversity divination Divine Mercy divorce Docetism domestic church dualism duty Easter economics education elections emotions England entertainment environmental issues Epiphany Establishment Clause ethics ethnicity Eucharist eugenics Europe evangelizing evolution exobiology exoplanets exorcism extremophiles faith faith and works family Father's Day Faust Faustus fear of the Lord fiction Final Judgment First Amendment forgiveness Fortnight For Freedom free will freedom fun genetics genocide geoengineering geology getting a grip global Gnosticism God God's will good judgment government gratitude great commission guest post guilt Haiti Halloween happiness hate health Heaven Hell HHS hierarchy history holidays Holy Family Holy See Holy Spirit holy water home schooling hope humility humor hypocrisy idolatry image of God images Immaculate Conception immigrants in the news Incarnation Independence Day India information technology Internet Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Japan Jesus John Paul II joy just war justice Kansas Kenya Knights of Columbus knowledge Korea language Last Judgment last things law learning Lent Lenten Chaplet life issues love magi magic Magisterium Manichaeism marriage martyrs Mary Mass materialism media medicine meditation Memorial Day mercy meteor meteorology Mexico Minnesota miracles Missouri moderation modesty Monophysitism Mother Teresa of Calcutta Mother's Day movies music Muslims myth natural law neighbor Nestorianism New Year's Eve New Zealand news Nietzsche obedience Oceania organization original sin paleontology parish Parousia penance penitence Pentecost Philippines physical disability physics pilgrimage politics Pope Pope in Germany 2011 population growth positive law poverty prayer predestination presumption pride priests prophets prostitution Providence Purgatory purpose quantum entanglement quotes reason redemption reflections relics religion religious freedom repentance Resurrection robots Roman Missal Third Edition rosaries rules sacramentals Sacraments Saints salvation schools science secondary causes SETI sex shrines sin slavery social justice solar planets soul South Sudan space aliens space exploration Spain spirituality stem cell research stereotypes stewardship stories storm Sudan suicide Sunday obligation superstition symbols technology temptation terraforming the establishment the human condition tolerance Tradition traffic Transfiguration Transubstantiation travel Trinity trust truth uncertainty United Kingdom universal destination of goods vacation Vatican Vatican II veneration vengeance Veterans Day videos virtue vlog vocations voting war warp drive theory wealth weather wisdom within reason work worship writing

Marian Apparition: Champion, Wisconsin

Background:Posts in this blog: In the news:

What's That Doing in a Nice Catholic Blog?

From time to time, a service that I use will display links to - odd - services and retailers.

I block a few of the more obvious dubious advertisers.

For example: psychic anything, numerology, mediums, and related practices are on the no-no list for Catholics. It has to do with the Church's stand on divination. I try to block those ads.

Sometime regrettable advertisements get through, anyway.

Bottom line? What that service displays reflects the local culture's norms, - not Catholic teaching.